Difference Stackelberg Game Theoretic Model of Innovations Management in Universities

Authors

  • Vassily Yu. Kalachev Southern Federal University
  • Guennady A. Ougolnitsky Southern Federal University
  • Anatoly B. Usov Southern Federal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu31.2022.08

Abstract

We built a two-level difference game theoretic model "federal state universities" in open-loop strategies. The leading player (Principal) is the state or its representative bodies, the followers (agents) are competing a la Cournot universities. The agents assign their resources to the development of new online teaching courses which are considered as their innovative investments. An optimality principle from the point of view of agents is a set of Nash equilibria in their game in normal form, and from the point of view of the Principal it is a solution of the direct or inverse Stackelberg game "Principal-agents". The respective dynamic problems of conflict control are solved by means of the Pontryagin maximum principle and simulation modeling. The received results are analyzed, and the main conclusion is that two-level system of control of the innovative educational products promotion in the universities is necessary.

Keywords:

difference Stackelberg games, economic corruption, resource allocation, simulation modeling

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Basar, T. and Olsder, G. J. (1999). Dynamic Non-Cooperative Game Theory. SIAM

Cellini, R. and Lambertini, L. (2002). A differential game approach to investment in product differentiation. J. of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27(1), 51–62

Cellini, R. and Lambertini, L. (2004). Private and social incentives towards investment in product differentiation. International Game Theory Review, 6(4), 493–508

Dockner, E., Jorgensen, S., Long, N. V. and Sorger, G. (2000). Differential Games in Economics and Management Science. Cambridge University Press

Geraskin, M. I. (2020). Reflexive Games in the Linear Stackelberg Duopoly Models under Incoincident Reflexion Ranks. Automation and Remote Control, 81(2), 302–319

Gorelov, M. A. and Kononenko, A. F. (2015). Dynamic Models of Conflicts. III. Hierarchical Games. Automation and Remote Control, 76(2), 264–277

Intriligator, M. D. (1971). Mathematical Optimization and Economic Theory. Prentice-Hall

Malsagov, M. Kh., Ougolnitsky, G. A. and Usov, A. B. (2020). A Differential Stackelberg Game Theoretic Model of the Promotion of Innovations in Universities. Advances in Systems Science and Applications, 20(3), 166–177

Novikov, D. (ed.) (2013). Mechanism Design and Management: Mathematical Methods for Smart Organizations. N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers

Ougolnitsky, G. A. (2016). Sustainable Management in Active Systems. Rostov-on-Don: SFedU Publishers (in Russian)

Ougolnitsky, G. A. and Usov, A. B. (2016). Solution algorithms for differential models of hierarchical control systems. Automation and Remote Control, 77(5), 872–880

Ougolnitsky, G. A. and Usov, A. B. (2018). Computer Simulations as a Solution Method for Differential Games.Computer Simulations: Advances in Research and Applications. Eds. M. D. Pfeffer and E. Bachmaier. N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers, 63–106

Ougolnitsky, G. A. and Usov, A. B. (2019). Dynamic Models of Coordination of Private and Social Interests in the Promotion of Innovations. Mathematical Game Theory and Applications, 11(1), 96–114 (in Russian)

Pontryagin, L. S., Boltyanskii, V. G., Gamkrelidze, R. V. and Mishchenko, E. F. (1962). The mathematical theory of optimal processes. N. Y. - London: Interscience Publishers John Wiley and Sons, Inc

Ugol'nitskii, G. A. and Usov, A. B. (2014). Equilibria in models of hierarchically organized dynamic systems with regard to sustainable development conditions. Automation and Remote Control, 75(6), 1055–1068

Downloads

Published

2023-01-26

How to Cite

Kalachev, V. Y., Ougolnitsky, G. A., & Usov, A. B. (2023). Difference Stackelberg Game Theoretic Model of Innovations Management in Universities. Contributions to Game Theory and Management, 15, 96–108. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu31.2022.08

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)