Static and Dynamic Game Theoretic Models of Opinion Control in Marketing Networks

Authors

  • Movlatkhan T. Agieva Ingush State University, Magistralnaya St. 39, Nazran, 386132, Russia
  • Alexey V. Korolev National Research University Higher School of Economics at St. Petersburg, Kantemirovskaya St. 3A, St. Petersburg, 190008, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2519-6623
  • Guennady A. Ougolnitsky Southern Federal University, J.I. Vorovich Institute of Mathematics, Mechanics and Computer Sciences, Milchakov St. 8a, Rostov-on-Don, 344090, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-5144

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu31.2021.01

Abstract

In this paper we consider game theoretic models of control on networks with application to marketing. We suppose that all strong subgroups are determined in the stage of analysis of the influence digraph, and the control impact is exerted only to the members of those subgroups because they determine all stable final opinions. An agent's opinion is interpreted as his expenses for buying goods (services) of a firm. The following problem of opinion control is being studied. A dynamic (difference) game in normal form where the players solve the problem of maximization of the sum of opinions of the members of a target audience by means of the closed-loop strategies of impact to the current opinions of the members of strong subgroups. We received the analytical solutions and conducted their comparative analysis.

Keywords:

games in normal form, models of impact and control on networks, marketing

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Agieva, M. T., Korolev, A. V., Ougolnitsky, G. A. (2019). Modeling and Simulation of Impact and Control in Social Networks. Modelling and Simulation of Social-Behavioural Phenomena in Creative Societies: First International EURO Mini Conference, MSBC 2019. Vilnius, Lithuania, September 18-20, 2019 Proceedings. N. Agarwal, L. Sakalauskas, G.-W. Weber (Eds.). Communications in Computer and Information Science 1079. Springer, 2019. pp. 29–40

Agieva, M. T., Korolev, A. V., Ougolnitsky, G. A. (2020). Modeling and Simulation of Impact and Control in Social Networks with Application to Marketing. Mathematics, 8(9), 1529

Aleskerov, F. T., Blagoveshchensky, N. Yu., Satarov, G. A., et al. (2007). Influence and structural stability in the Russian Parliament (1905-1917 and 1993-2005 years).: Moscow.–312 p. (in Russian)

Chkhartishvili, A. G., Gubanov, D. A., Novikov, D. A. (2019). Social Networks: Models of information influence, control and confrontation. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 189, pp. 1–158

Chwe, M. S. (2000). Communication and Coordination in Social Networks. Review of Economic Studies, 67, 1–16

De Groot, M. H. (1974). Reaching a Consensus. Journal of American Statistical Association, 69, 118–121

De Marzo, P., Vayanos, D., Zwiebel, J. (2003). Persuasion Bias, Social Influence and Unidimensional Opinions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 909–968

French, J., R. (1956). A formal theory of social power. The Psychological Review, 63, 181–194

Godes, D., Mayzlin, D. (2004). Using Online Conversations to Study Word of Mouth Communication. Marketing Science, 23, 545–560

Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., Muller, E. (2001). Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth. Marketing Letters, 2, 11–34

Golub, B., Jackson, M. (2010). Naive Learning in Social Networks and the Wisdom of Crowds. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(1), 112–149

Gubanov, D. A., Novikov, D. A., Chkhartishvili, A. G. (2011). Informational influence and informational control models in social networks. Automation and Remote Control, 72(7), 1557–1567

Harary, F. (1959). A Criterion for Unanimity in French's Theory of Social Power. Studies in Social Power. Michigan: Institute of Sociological Research, pp. 168–182

Hegselman, R., Krause, U. (2002). Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence Models: Analysis and Simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(3)

Jackson, M. (2008). Social and Economic Networks. Princeton University Press. – 504 p

Jackson M., Wolinsky, A. (1996). A strategic model of social and economic networks. J. Economic Theory, 71(1), 44–74

Jackson, M., Zenou, Y. (2014). Games on networks. Handbook of game theory. Eds. Young, P., Zamir, S. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 95–163

Jorgensen, S., Zaccour, G. (2004). Differential Games in Marketing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, – 176 p

Jorgensen, S., Zaccour, G. (2014). A Survey of Game-Theoretic Models of Cooperative Advertising. European J. of Operations Research, 237(1), 1–14

Korolev, A. V., Ougolnitsky, G. A. (2020). Optimal resource allocation in the difference and differential Stackelberg games on marketing networks. J. of Dynamics and Games, 7(2), 141–162

Novikov, D. A. (2014). Games and networks. Automation and Remote Control, 75(6), 1145–1154

Roberts, F. (1976). Discrete Mathematical Models, with Applications to Social, Bio-logical and Environmental Problems. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ

Downloads

Published

2021-10-30

How to Cite

Agieva, M. T., Korolev, A. V., & Ougolnitsky, G. A. (2021). Static and Dynamic Game Theoretic Models of Opinion Control in Marketing Networks. Contributions to Game Theory and Management, 14, 8–19. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu31.2021.01

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)