Game-Theoretic Models of Collaboration among Economic Agents
Abstract
In present article are considered the models explaining the mechanisms of emergence and development of situations, in which it is appropriate for economic agents to collaborate and act together despite of having independent goals. The main attention is concentrated to different approaches to definition of concept of equilibrium for model of collaboration of two agents.
The work is devoted to problems in the study of economic instruments, inducing the agents, which initially have independent and uncoordinated systems of goals to commission any beneficial actions. Particularly, we consider an interaction of economic agents when each of them may take the actions, that bring benefit to other. Stimulus to "positive" behavior each agent is a waiting counter actions, that will be useful for him. To identify this class of situations it is proposed to use the term "collaboration". In a model of collaboration between two economic agents is proposed version to express of mixed strategies of players in the form of continuous distribution, which enabled us to formulate two alternative approaches of equilibrium: based on the criterion of minimizing variance of utility of participants and based on the criterion of minimizing of VaR.
Keywords:
Game theory, collaboration, Nash equilibrium, value at risk (VaR), quantile
Downloads
References
Vorobiev, N. (1984). Fundamentals of the game theory: noncooperative games. Moskow (in Russian).
Vorobiev, N. (1985). Game theory for economists-cybernetics. Moskow (in Russian).
Moulin, H. (1985). Game theory with examples of mathematical economics. Moskow (in Russian).
Pecherskiy, S., Belyaeva, A. (2001). Game theory for economists. St.Petersburg (in Russian).
Binmore, K. (1987). Modeling Rational Players I. Economics and Philosophy, 3. pp. 179–214.
Binmore, K. (1988). Modeling Rational Players II. Economics and Philosophy, 4. pp. 9–55.
Cheon, T. (2003). Altruistic Duality in Evolutionary Game Theory. Laboratory of Physics, Kochi University of Technology, Tosa Yamada, Kochi 782-8502, Japan, August 28.
Jorion, Ph. (2006). Value at Risk. McGraw-Hill.
Markowits, H.M. (1952). Portfolio Selection Journal of Finance. 7. N 1. pp. 71–91.
Markowitz, H.M. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment. Wiley. New York.
Markowitz, H.M. (1990). Mean Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets. Basil. Blackwell.
Nash, Jh. (1950). The Bargaining problem Econometrica, Vol.18, No.2, pp. 155–162.
Rubinstein, A. (1998). Modeling Bounded Rationality Cambudge, MA: The MIT Press (M).
Simon, H.A. (1972). Theories of bounded Rationality. C.B.McGruire and R.Radner eds. Decision and Organization, Amsterdam: North–Holland, pp. 161–176.
Value at Risk 3 Edition: New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk. McGraw–Hill Education–Europe
http://www.svyaznoybank.ru/home/bank.aspx
http://eco.ria.ru/nature/20100621/248683799.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Contributions to Game Theory and Management" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.