Coordination in Multilevel Supply Chain

Authors

  • Ekaterina N. Zenkevich Saint Petersburg State University
  • Yulia E. Lonyagina Saint Petersburg State University
  • Maria V. Fattakhova Saint Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation

Abstract

There is a task of coordination in the multilevel supply chains with the tree-like structure taking into consideration the linearity of supply in the final markets that is discussed in this article. Three ways are suggested by authors in order to solve the chain coordination problem, i. e. to the rule of the players' strategies choice that are satisfying the certain criteria of optimality. The first way is a decentralized solution that will be issued only when all the supply chain participants act independently from each other. The second way is the optimization of the overall chain's revenue in the cooperative game, so called centralized solution. Finally, the third solution is the Nash weighted solution that is created by the optimization of the Nash weighted multiplication. Based on the particular example there is a comparison of all the ways discussed in the article.

Keywords:

Multilevel supply chains, tree-like structure, overall chains revenue, Nash weighted solution

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Petrosyan, L. A., Zenkevich, N. A. and E. V. Shevkoplyas (2014). Game theory. 2nd Edition. BCV-Press, Saint-Petersburg, 432 p.

Adida, E., DeMiguel, V. (2011). Supply Chain competition with multiple manufacturers and retailers. Operation Research, Vol. 59(1), 156–172.

Cachon, G. P. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research & Management Science, 11, 227–339.

Carr, M. S., Karmarkar, U. S. (2005). Competition in multi-echelon assembly supply chains. Management Science, 51, 45–59.

Cho, S.-H. (2014). Horizontal mergers in multi-tier decentralized chains. Management Science, 51, 45–59.

Corbett, C., Karmarkar, U. S. (2001). Competition and structure in serial supply chains with deterministic demand. Management science, 47, 966–978.

Gasratov, M. G., Zacharov, V. V. (2011). Game-theoretic approach for supply chains optimization in case of dterministic demand. Game theory and applications, 3(1), 23–59.

Gorbaneva, O. I., Ougolnitsky, G. A. (2016). Static models of concordance of private and public interests in resource allocation. Game theory and applications, 8(2), 28–57.

Kaya, M., Ozer, O. (2012). Pricing in business-to-business contracts: sharing risk, profit and information. The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 738–783.

Laseter, T., Oliver, K. (2003). When will supply chain management grow up? Strategy+business, Issue 32.

Tyagi, R. K. (1999). On the effect of downstream entry. Management science, 45, 59–73.

Vickers, J. (1995). Competition and regulation and vertically related markets. Review of economics study, 62, 1–17.

Zenkevich, N. A., Zyatchin, A. V. (2016). Strong coalitional structure in a transportation game. Game theory and applications, 8(1), 63–79.

Zhou, D., Karmarkar, U. S., Jiang, B. (2015). Competition in multi-echelon distributive supply chains with linear demand. International Journal of Production Research, 53(22), 6787–6807.

Ziss, S. (1995). Vertical separation and horizontal mergers. Journal of industrial economics, 43, 63–75.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-17

How to Cite

Zenkevich, E. N., Lonyagina, Y. E., & Fattakhova, M. V. (2022). Coordination in Multilevel Supply Chain. Contributions to Game Theory and Management, 10. Retrieved from https://gametheory.spbu.ru/article/view/13268

Issue

Vol. 10 (2017)

Section

Articles

License

Articles of "Contributions to Game Theory and Management" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.