Opinion Control in a Team with Complete and Incomplete Communication

Authors

  • Vladimir V. Mazalov Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Saint Petersburg State University
  • Yulia A. Dorofeeva Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Petrozavodsk State University
  • Elena M. Parilina St. Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu31.2020.17

Abstract

We examine the influence of management of the opinion of a group members, while the group of agents are considered with different communication structures. We consider the optimization problem in dynamics with feedback information structure. In the model, the communication structure plays an important role since not all agents are directly connected with each other. The influence of the agents on each other is taken into account in the equation of dynamics of agents' opinions. An agent weights the other agents' opinions and after that forms the next step opinion. Two types of communication structures are considered in the model. The results of numerical modeling illustrate the influence of some parameters of the model (control, influence power of agents on each other) on the optimal opinion dynamics.

Keywords:

opinion dynamics, average opinion, feedback optimal control, Bellman function

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Başar, T. and Olsder, G. J. (1998). Dynamic noncooperative game theory. New York: Academic Press

Barabanov, I. N., Korgin, N. A., Novikov, D. A., Chkhartishvili, A. G. (2010). Dynamics models of informational control in social networks. Autom. Remote Control, 71, 2417–2426

Bauso, D., Tembine, H., Başar, T. (2016). Opinion dynamics in social networks through mean field games. Control opinion, 54, 3225–3257

Bure, V. M., Parilina, E. M., Sedakov A. A. (2017). Consensus in a social network with two principals. Autom. Remote Control, 78, 1489–1499

Chkhartishvili, A. G., Gubanov, D. A., Novikov, D. A. (2019). Social network: Models of information influence. Control and Confrontation. Switzerland

De Groot, M. (1974). Reaching a consensus. Am. Stat. Assoc., 69, 119–121

Dorofeeva, Yu. A. (2020). Management effects on the dynamics of opinions in a team. Proceedings of Karelian Research Centre of RAS, 7, 28–33

Friedkin, N. and Johnsen, E. (1990). Social influence and opinions. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15, 193–206

Hegselmann, R. and Krause, U. (2005). Opinion dynamics driven by various ways of averaging. Comp. econ., 25, 381–405

Leonov, G. A. (2004). Theory of control. Saint Petersburg University

Mazalov, V. V. (2016). Mathematical Game Theory and Applications. Lan Publishing House

Mazalov, V. and Parilina, E. (2019). Game of competition for opinion with two centers of influence. Mathematical Optimization Theory and Operations Research – 18th International Conference, MOTOR 2019, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer, 11548 LNCS, pp. 673–684

Mazalov, V. V. and Parilina, E. M. (2020). The Euler-Equation Approach in Average-Oriented Opinion Dynamics. Mathematics, 8(3), 1–16

Parilina, E. and Sedakov, A. (2014). Stable Cooperation in Graph-Restricted Games. Contributions to game theory and management, Vol. VII, 271–281

Rogov, M. A. and Sedakov A. A. (2020). Coordinated Influence on the Opinions of Social Network Members. Automation and Remote Control, 81(3), 528–547

Sedakov, A. A. and Zhen, M. (2019). Opinion dynamics game in a social network with two influence nodes. Vestn. St. Petersburg Univ. Appl. Math. Comp. Sci., 15, 118–125

Sirbu, A., Lorento, V., Servedio, V., Francessa, T. (2016). Opinion dynamics: models, extensions and external effects. Physics and Society, 5, 363-401

Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F. (2005). Persuasion dynamics. Physica A, 353, 555–575

Downloads

Published

2022-02-03

How to Cite

Mazalov, V. V., Dorofeeva , Y. A., & Parilina, E. M. (2022). Opinion Control in a Team with Complete and Incomplete Communication. Contributions to Game Theory and Management, 13. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu31.2020.17

Issue

Section

Articles